Vandalism
To The City: Fri, Dec 29, 2023, 4:08 PM
Jeremy;
Over the years, there have been incidents of vandalism at both Bi-Centennial Park and at the Public Service Memorial that was dedicated during the Malz administration.
As I recall in one of the acts of vandalism committed in Bi-Centennial Park, the bark had been chopped away from the trunk of a tree; and another one of the acts of vandalism at the Public Service Memorial, involved the breaking off the barrel of a rifle on one of the statues.
Did the City ever find out the identity of the person or persons responsible for these intentional acts of vandalism against the City of Hamburg and its residents ?
Certainly; the City should have a record or documentation of acts of vandalism committed against it. In addition to the above requested information, what is the total number of times, and locations; that similar acts of vandalism have taken place against the City of Hamburg in, say; the past ten years?
Thank you in advance for your anticipated cooperation in providing me the above-requested information.
Richard Odoms
150 Jacob Street
Hamburg, Minnesota 55339
Jeremy Gruenhagen
From The City: Thu, Jan 4, 10:21 AM
Mr. Odoms,
Thank you for your email inquiry seeking answers to questions from the city as opposed to seeking the production of municipal data. The city is not in possession of any data that would contain answers to your below questions. The city is unable to provide answers to your questions. The city would refer you to the county for data that may contain answers to your questions. Thank you for your inquiry.
Sincerely,
Jeremy Gruenhagen
City Clerk-Treasurer
P.O. Box 248
181 Broadway Avenue
Hamburg, MN 55339
952-467-3232
Vandalism
To The City: Jan 4, 2024, 12:53 PM
NOT an acceptable response, but CERTAINLY an EVASIVE one. I'm not seeking data, I am seeking answers.
If you, or any other City Official has, or knows, the answers to very basic questions asked by a resident whose property taxes go toward paying YOUR WAGES and the WAGES of the OTHER CITY OFFICIALS, and that PUBLIC OFFICIAL FAILS or REFUSES to provide that requested basic information, that constitutes MISCONDUCT OF PUBLIC OFFICIAL OR EMPLOYEE; a VIOLATION OF MINNESOTA STATUTE 609.43 !! The penalty for such actions is stated as "... may be sentenced to imprisonment for not more than 364 days or to payment of a fine of not more than $3,000.00 or both."
Let me 'rephrase' my inquiries to the City:
Regarding the incidents of vandalism involving the breaking off of the barrel of a replica gun being held by one of the statues at the Service Memorial and the bark being stripped away from the trunk of a tree in Bi-Centennial Park;
1.) Did the City make file a report with the Carver County Sheriff's Office regarding either incident and,
2.) Does the City have ANY knowledge, of ANY kind, regarding the act(s) of vandalism described and contained herein, of the identity of the alleged, or actual; perpetrator of either/both crimes, and/or if the alleged/actual perpetrator is related, in ANY way, to ANY elected Official of the City of Hamburg ? Did the City ever receive ANY restitution, of ANY kind,for the acts of vandalism against the City and it's residents ?
3) Has the Hamburg Community Hall ever sustained any act of theft or vandalism or has it ever been burglarized ? If so, was a report of ANY kind filed with the Carver County Sheriff's Office regarding the act(s) of said theft, vandalism or burglary of the Hamburg Community Hall ? Was the identity of the alleged, or actual; perpetrator(s) of the alleged crimes listed ever determined and if so, is the alleged/actual perpetrator(s) related, in ANY way, to ANY elected Official of the City of Hamburg?
4.) What is the status of the three incidents referred to the Carver County Sheriff's Office last fall to cite residents whose properties were 'unkempt' and failed to heed previous notifications by the City that they were in violation of one or more City Ordinances ? (See attachment.)
5.) According to the Carver County Property records that I just viewed,it appears that the title of the portion of the Trebesch property recently allegedly acquired by the City, remains in the Trebesch family name. With the impending probability of a 'plowableable snow' this weekend and also possible next week, because the City is not the legal owner of the property, it follows that the City is precluded from accessing that property for ANY reason and, were the City or their 'agent' to do so; would be guilty of Trespass and in violation of Minnesota Statute 609.605.
6) How is the City addressing the property dispute issue that was RESOLVED nearly ONE YEAR AGO ?
Richard Odoms
150 Jacob Street
Hamburg, Minnesota 55339
I'm PUBLICLY RELEASING OVER 150 PAGES Of DOCUMENTS, Many Of Which Have NEVER
BEEN SEEN BEFORE And Include RUDE, VULGAR, And DEMEANING TEXT MESSAGES
Sent Between HAMBURG CITY OFFICIALS 'TARGETING' A CITY EMPLOYEE
WHO THEY WERE TRYING TO FORCE TO QUIT !!
(SOUND FAMILIAR ?? It WILL When You Read My Book !!)
Extracted From
OVER FIFTY PAGES
Of
INTERNAL CITY DOCUMENTS
That I've Obtained !!
TO PURCHASE YOUR OWN
PERSONAL COPY OF
"PUBLIC OFFICIALS BEHAVING BADLY"
NOW ONLY $47.25
(INCLUDED Sales Tax & Postage)
(NO C.O.D.'s)
NOTE: As of January 25, 2024, the
CITY OF HAMBURG NEVER RESPONDED !!
ADDITIONAL DOCUMENTS & WRITTEN COMMUNICATION EXCHANGES WITH THE
CITY OF HAMBURG CONTINUE BELOW (In Ascending Chronological Order As Much As Possible.)
Wed, Jan 24, 7:57 AM
To City Of Hamburg
Please refer to my e-mail dated January 4, 2024 wherein I sought specific PUBLIC INFORMATION from the City of Hamburg. To date, you have REFUSED TO RESPOND to that January 4th e-mail; attached hereto, and have REFUSED TO PROVIDE to me; the requested PUBLIC INFORMATION !!
Please provide an explanation as to why, since nearly ONE MONTH HAS PASSED from my initial request; I have NOT RECEIVED A RESPONSE FROM THE CITY !!
Is the City of Hamburg's REFUSAL TO PROVIDE PUBLIC INFORMATION to a CITY RESIDENT, YOUR SOLE DECISION and ACTION, or were you DIRECTED to REFUSE my request for PUBLIC INFORMATION; by 'other' City Officials ?
If you were DIRECTED to REFUSE my request by those 'other' City Officials, please provide the identity of that/those HAMBURG CITY OFFICIAL/OFFICIALS.
I reassert my request for the information sought in my January 4, 2024 e-mail to you, as well as, additionally; the date(s) of the City Council meetings at which that the PUBLIC INFORMATION incidents of VANDALISM at BI-CENTENNIAL PARK were discussed.
Similarly, upon receiving my initial request for details and information regarding the TREBESCH vs CITY OF HAMBURG civil litigation, as well as providing me with a copy of the Summons and Complaint served on City of Hamburg; YOU AGAIN REFUSED TO PROVIDE PUBLIC INFORMATION to a CITY RESIDENT !!
To further exacerbate your already serious and grave transgressions, YOU, PERSONALLY; and in your capacity as HAMBURG CITY CLERK/TREASURER REPRESENTING, and ON BEHALF OF THE CITY OF HAMBURG; personally, and INTENTIONALLY, also AUTHORED, and TRANSMITTED TO ME; an e-mail, (which is an OFFICIAL CITY DOCUMENT of the City of Hamburg); KNOWING that said e-mail CONTAINED FALSE, FRAUDULENT, UNTRUE and FABRICATED INFORMATION !!
Clearly, your actions (or lack thereof) in these matters, alone; are NUMEROUS ABSOLUTE VIOLATIONS of MINNESOTA STATUTE 609.43; MISCONDUCT OF PUBLIC OFFICIAL OR EMPLOYEE, as cited in my original, and attached; January 4, 2024 e-mail.
Was the FABRICATION and TRANSMISSION of an OFFICIAL CITY DOCUMENT that KNOWINGLY CONTAINED FALSE and FRAUDULENT INFORMATION to a CITY RESIDENT, YOUR SOLE DECISION and ACTION, or were you DIRECTED to do so by 'other' City Officials ?
If you were DIRECTED to do so by those 'other' City Officials, please provide the identity of that/those HAMBURG CITY OFFICIAL/OFFICIALS.
In comparison of the EXEMPLARY SERVICE & PERFORMANCE of the HAMBURG FIRE DEPARTMENT that I recently PERSONALLY EXPERIENCED, your 'service and performance', as the CITY'S CLERK/TREASURER and as described herein, is DEPLORABLE, REPREHENSIBLE and an EMBARRASSMENT to the City of Hamburg !!
I await receipt of the information previously sought.
Richard Odoms
150 Jacob Street
Hamburg, Minnesota 55339
PLEASE CHECK BACK FREQUENTLY AS THIS
WEBPAGE IS BEING CONTINUALLY UPDATED !!
Date: Wednesday, January 24, 2024 8:13 AM
Kelly,
Give me a call at your earliest convenience!
Jeremy Gruenhagen
City Clerk-Treasurer
P.O. Box 248
181 Broadway Avenue
Hamburg, MN 55339
952-467-3232.
THE 'CONSPIRACY' CONTINUES; THE 'SCHEMING' BEGINS .................
COMMENT: 'Kelly' is KELLY C. DOHM, an attorney supplied to the City of Hamburg under contract and affilliated with the Waconia
based law firm of MELCHERT, HUBERT & SJODIN, and Dohm acts as the 'contract' HAMBURG CITY ATTORNEY.
INTERESTING NOTE:When I was a City Council Member (2013-2017) the Hamburg City Council
PAID DOHM'S LAW FIRM APPROXIMATELY $50,000.00 trying UNSUCCESSFULLY to
FORCE ME TO RESIGN MY CITY COUNCIL POSITTION !!
I served my ENTIRE four year term. (It's ALL in my book; "PUBLIC OFFICIALS BEHAVING BADLY". )
Here are a couple of MINNESOTA STATUTES that will be of interest to you:
date:Jan 24, 2024, 8:13 AM
subject:Re: Request for Information
signed-by:cityofhamburgmn-com.20230601.gappssmtp.com
security: Standard encryption (TLS) Learn more
:Important according to Google magic..
Now, the CITY OF HAMBURG is 'SCHEMING' and 'CONSPIRING' with
'contract' HAMBURG CITY ATTORNEY KELLY C. DOHM trying to
PREVENT ME FROM OBTAINING PUBLIC INFORMATION
REGARDING CRIMINAL ACTIVITY IN THE CITY !!
AND MY RESPONSE TO TO THE CITY OF HAMBURG WAS .......
January 26, 2024 9:58 PM
to City
This e-mail has three purposes:
1. To acknowledge 'contract' City Attorney Kelley C. Dohm's nebulous e-mail response to me of January 26, 2024, and
2. AGAIN, for the THIRD TIME; request accurate responses to the inquiries for information sent to the City on January 4, 2024 and on January 24, 2024.
Additionally, regarding the vandalism that occurred in Bi-Centennial Park, do you confirm or deny that you, in fact; verbally told a City resident(s) that at least one of the acts of vandalism at Bi-Centennial Park was committed by the son of Hamburg Mayor Christopher Lund ?
Calling your attention to the consequences for violating MINNESOTA STATUTE 609.43 - MISCONDUCT OF PUBLIC OFFICIAL OR EMPLOYEE, which, among other topics; ADDRESSES, DICTATES and REQUIRES that you shall be TRUTHFUL, HONEST, and ETHICAL at ALL times and under ALL circumstances, I await your PERSONAL response.
Richard E. Odoms
150 Jacob Street
Hamburg, Minnesota 55339
COPYRIGHT 2023 RICHARD ODOMS
Retired Deputy Sheriff * Current Hamburg Resident * Hamburg City Council Member 2013 - 2017
Before anyone gets their underwear in a knot, be advised that this Website and/or any of its contents, may NOT be printed, photographed, reproduced, copied,
recorded, altered, modified or adapted, in any manner, without the prior written consent of the Webmaster. The entire content of this Website
remains the exclusive and sole property of the Website owner and publisher and is protected under the
First Amendment of the Constitution of the United States of America.
Public Nuisance - 320 Sophia Avenue - Gregonis Property
To The City: Wed, Sep 27, 2023, 5:15 PM
At the June 13, 2023 Hamburg City Council Meeting, discussion was held regarding the above-captioned property.
From listening to the sporadic recording of the City Council proceedings that date, I was able to discern that an owner of the property, believed to be former City Council member Robert Gregonis, appeared before the City Council on September 13, 2022 regarding the slovenly condition and appearance of the property. The property owner stated that the current work being done in the outside of the garage would be completed by June 1, 2023.
The June 13, 2023 City Council meeting recording further revealed that the promised completion date had come and gone and the stated work to be done by June 1, 2023, had not been accomplished as the City Council was told that it would be.
Further, you stated during the June 13th meeting that no construction permit had been applied for; apparently a requirement for the work that was supposed to be completed.
It was agreed by the Hamburg City Council at the June 13, 2023 City Council meeting that the matter was to be forwarded to the Carver County Attorney's Office for prosecution of the owners for violation(s) of the City Ordinance.
You clearly stated that you would "'move forward with it".
As recently as yesterday morning I drove by the subject property and it is quite obvious, as discussed at the June 13th City Council meeting, that no 'progress' has been made, and the overall appearance of the property, replete with all of the 'junk' stored on and distributed throughout the property, is a serious, unappealing blight on the entire neighborhood.
On what date did the City 1.) Contact the Carver County Attorney's Office to set in motion, prosecution of the property owners for violation of the City Ordinance(s) and, 2.) What is the current status of that prosecution ?
The Website for the Hamburg Lions Club lists Robert Gregonis, one of the registered owners of the dilapidated property at 320 Sophia Street, as the Second Vice President of the Hamburg Lions and Gregonis' personal friend, fellow Lion and Hamburg Mayor Christopher Lund, is the President of the Hamburg Lions Club.
I await your response; I also 'smell another rat' !!
Thank you.
Richard Odoms
150 Jacob Street
Hamburg, Minnesota 55339
ADDITIONAL DOCUMENTS & WRITTEN COMMUNICATION EXCHANGES WITH THE CITY OF HAMBURG CONTINUE BELOW
(In Ascending Chronological Order As Much As Possible.)
ADDITIONAL DOCUMENTS & WRITTEN COMMUNICATION EXCHANGES WITH THE
CITY OF HAMBURG CONTINUE BELOW (In Ascending Chronological Order As Much As Possible.)
ADDITIONAL DOCUMENTS & WRITTEN COMMUNICATION EXCHANGES WITH THE
CITY OF HAMBURG CONTINUE BELOW (In Ascending Chronological Order As Much As Possible.)
Dohm Can't Even GET THE NAME OF THE STREET RIGHT !! TWICE !!
Dohm Can't Even GET THE NAME OF THE STREET RIGHT !!
January 8, 2024
Mr. Timothy J. Droske
MINNESOTA SUPREME COURT COMMISSIONER
25 Reverend. Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr. Boulevard
St. Paul, Minnesota 55155
RE: My November 3 & December 18, 2024 Letters to the Chief Justice & Associate Justices
Dear Mr. Droske:
Thank you for your letter dated January 2, 2024; received in an ‘unsealed’ envelope. It would seem fitting and proper to me that, for security reasons; your written communication to me would AT LEAST be minimally deserving of the security that a ‘sealed’ envelope would afford, NOT merely a strip of cellophane tape attached to the ‘flap’ of the unsealed envelope.
I am also ‘troubled’ by the content of your January 2nd letter for a variety of reasons, the first one being the wording that you used. By your remarks, it is OBVIOUS TO ME that you ‘don’t understand’ the complexities or the magnitude; of what’s taken place, you haven’t read my book, “PUBLIC OFFICIALS BEHAVING BADLY”; and, subsequently; haven’t had access to the hundreds of pages of ’supporting documentation’ and ‘substantiating evidence’ that my book contains, that I have amassed and collected over the past several YEARS !! It is also worth noting that I was a Hamburg City Council member from 2013-2017.
Not having read my book describing, in detail; what’s taken place and who is involved, well; it’s sort of like a lawyer going to Court without having thoroughly researched the facts of the case against his client that he is representing. The ‘client’ deserves better representation.
Second, it would appear to me that one or more, perhaps ALL; of my two letters sent to the Chief Justice and the six Associate Justices, were ‘intercepted’ by you or a member of your staff and never forward to the intended recipients of the Court !!
Did the Chief Justice or ANY of the six Associate Justices EVER receive ANY of my fourteen letters (two letters to seven Justices, sent six weeks apart) intended for them ??
I submit that the opening of letters addressed to the Chief Justice and/or six Associate Justices by you or members of your staff, may be procedurally acceptable. However, because of the very grave and serious, detailed information I provided in my letters and the serious allegations I made regarding the MISCONDUCT of, and a ‘COVER UP’ by (at least) one but (probably) more members of the OFFICE OF LAWYER’S PROFESSIONAL RESPONSIBILITY, I would hope that my information would have been ‘taken seriously’. It wasn’t.
Mr. Timothy J. Droske
MINNESOTA SUPREME COURT COMMISSIONER
January 8, 2024
Page 2
What I’ve witnessed taking place in Carver County during the last four and a half years, is the BIGGEST ABUSE OF AUTHORITY and VIOLATION OF THE PUBLIC TRUST in the southwest metro area by PUBLIC OFFICALS in the CITY OF HAMBURG and in CARVER COUNTY since FORMER SCOTT COUNTY ATTORNEY KATHLEEN MORRIS; (Who CLAIMED PARENT/CHILD SEXUAL ABUSE TAKING PLACE IN JORDAN) & FORMER CARVER COUNTY SHERIFF CHIEF DEPUTY JAMES CASTLEBERRY; (Who SET UP A 'SECRET' BANK ACCOUNT FOR MONETARY DONATIONS HE SOLICITED FROM CARVER COUNTY BUSINESSES & PERSONS CLAIMING IT WAS FOR THE SHERIFF'S OFFICE !!)
Instead, my information was casually disregarded; after my taking the time and exerting the effort to alert the Court (THREE TIMES) of what’s taken place. (These last two times, it took TWO MONTHS for me to even be CONTACTED by the Court; only to be essentially told that my advising the Court of the knowledge I’ve gained and attempted to pass on to the Court about LAWYER MISCONDUCT, was superfluous; ‘WE’RE NOT INTERESTED’ !!
My eighty years of exercising ‘common sense’ tell me “THAT’S JUST WRONG” !!
Because the OFFICE OF LAWYERS PROFESSIONAL RESPONSIBILITY is DIRECTLY ACCOUNTABLE TO THE COURT, one doesn’t have to be a Harvard graduate to appreciate the necessity, urgency and appropriateness of notifying the Court of what has taken place that I tried, THREE TIMES; to report to the Court: LAWYER MISCONDUCT and the ‘MANIPULATION’ of the CRIMINAL JUSTICE SYSTEM in order to prevent detection of that MISCONDUCT and ‘MANIPULATION’, by those involved, to avoid them having to take, and accept; responsibility for their unethical actions and behaviors.
It’s INCOMPREHENSIBLE to believe, or even THINK; that the Court wouldn’t be DEEPLY CONCERNED about the information that I tried to impart to them; recently (twice) as well as previously (once) !! (In the former, your ‘predecessor’ LIKEWISE INTERCEPTED and WITHHELD, my information about what was taking place to the already troubled (Minneapolis Star-Tribune newspaper-December 11, 2021) OFFICE OF LAWYER’S PROFESSIONAL RESPONSIBILITY from reaching (former) Chief Justice Gildae and the six Associate Justices !!)
What I reported THEN should have been investigated, the action(s) thwarted and discipline meted out to the perpetrators. Instead; what was taking place then, continued unabated; and is STILL TAKING PLACE yet today !!
PUBLIC OFFICIAL MISCONDUCT and POLITICAL CORRUPTION have NO PLACE in our state, the residents of Minnesota have EVERY RIGHT TO EXPECT OUR PUBLIC OFFICIALS WILL BE HONEST, TRUSTWORTHY, ETHICAL and their behavior will be BEYOND REPROACH. Most PUBLIC OFFICIALS are, those that aren’t; must be ‘called out’ and dealt with swiftly, appropriately and harshly.
Mr. Timothy J. Droske
MINNESOTA SUPREME COURT COMMISSIONER
January 8, 2024
Page 3
As a law abiding citizen and a retired LAW ENFORCEMENT OFFICER with a nearly TWENTY YEAR career, I had/have an ‘obligation’ to report what I observed; PARTICULARLY so because it INVOLVES DISHONEST AND UNETHICAL PUBLIC OFFICIALS who are paid with TAXPAYER DOLLARS !!
What began as ‘unchecked’ and ‘ignored’ MISCONDUCT OF PUBLIC OFFICER(s) & EMPLOYEE(s) (MINNESOTA STATUTE 609.43) with CITY OFFICIALS in a small Minnesota City having only about 570 residents, has now ’morphed’ to include, in addition to the CITY’S MAYOR; the CITY’S COUNCILMEMBERS, the CITY’S CLERK/TREASURER and the ‘contract’ CITY ATTORNEY, the COUNTY ATTORNEY, the ’DEPUTY’ COUNTY ATTORNEY, MINNESOTA ATTORNEY GENERAL KEITH ELLISON and, yes; YOUR ‘BOSS’, MINNESOTA GOVERNOR TIM WALZ !!
By openly identifying the PUBLIC OFFICIALS INVOLVED, the PUBLIC OFFICE that they currently hold and describing their HEINOUS ACTS and DESPECABLE MISDEEDS that they have committed, it comes as no surprise to me, the amount of ’scurrying around’ by a variety OTHER PUBLIC OFFICIALS and AGENCIES to ‘shield’ those PUBLIC OFFICIALS (who are their ‘friends and buddies’) already identified and involved, in a sinister effort to PREVENT them from being ‘called out’ and held accountable for their inappropriate behavior, malfeasance, misfeasance and nonfeasance.
The average, clear thinking person, of which I consider myself to be, doesn’t just sit down and arbitrarily send out two letters to seven Minnesota Supreme Court Justices, six weeks apart, without proof, evidence, documentation and ‘just cause’.
While recognized WORLD-WIDE by Law Enforcement; apparently the ’catch phrase’, “SEE SOMETHING; SAY SOMETHING”; apparently isn’t ‘recognized’ by the ‘Administrative Staff’ of the highest Court in Minnesota !!
Similarly, my witnessing and experiencing what’s been taking place involving PUBLIC OFFICIALS for the past four and one-half years, coupled with my nearly twenty year Law Enforcement career and NOT SEEING ANY EFFORT to quell what’s taking place or hold the miscreants accountable, the phrase ‘Travesty of Justice’ has taken on an entirely new meaning to me.
I’m willing to ‘bet my last dollar’ that if Chief Justice Hudson and the Associate Justices really KNEW what’s been taking place over the past four and one-half yearsinvolving PUBLIC OFFICIALS and the OFFICE OF LAWYER’S PROFESSIONAL RESPONSIBILITY, that the Justices would, first; be GREATLY DISAPPOINTED in what’s taken place, second; in how poorly my well-intentioned reporting of PUBLIC OFFICIAL MISCONDUCT and CORRUPTION was dealt with and, three; would ‘address’, POST HASTE; the EXIGENT
Mr. Timothy J. Droske
MINNESOTA SUPREME COURT COMMISSIONER
January 8, 2024
Page 4
ISSUES and CIRCUMSTANCES that I INTENDED to be brought to their attention, !!
I tried to ‘sound the alarm’ to tell them, THREE TIMES; but my ‘good faith’ efforts to ‘communicate’ to them, the facts of what’s been taking place; were ALL INTENTIONALLY THWARTED by the Court’s ’Administrative Staff’ and related bureaucracy !!
It’s a ‘SAD, SAD TIME’ for OUR GREAT STATE !!
Sincerely, and respectfully;
Richard Odoms
150 Jacob Street
Hamburg, Minnesota 55339
Author: “PUBLIC OFFICIALS BEHAVING BADLY”
cc: Minnesota Supreme Court Chief Justice Natalie Hudson & six Associate Justices
NOTE:
MINNESOTA SUPREME COURT COMMISSIONER TIMOTHY J. DROSKE
FAILED TO RESPOND
to or
EVEN ACKNOWLEDGE
this letter sent to him.
DATE: Feb 16, 2024 - 3:40 PM
TO: Hamburg City Clerk/Treasurer Jeremy Gruenhagen
SUBJECT: Vandalism - Bi-Centennial Park
The important, relevant and pertinent information, explanations and answers previously sought as a TAX PAYING CITIZEN of the CITY OF HAMBURG, were met, through YOUR REPREHENSIBLE ACTIONS on BEHALF OF THE CITY; by ONCE AGAIN REFUSING to provide the requested PUBLIC INFORMATION regarding CRIMINAL ACTIVITY that has been committed AGAINST THE CITY and AGAINST THE DIGNITY of CITY RESIDENTS.
Instead; you provided only NEBULOUS, INDISTINCT, INDIFFERENT and VAGUE RESPONSES in a FURTHER SURREPTITIOUS EFFORT to ONCE AGAIN, 'SUPPRESS' and further 'COVER UP', details of that CRIMINAL ACTIVITY that has taken place in the CITY OF HAMBURG because of WHO IS INVOLVED !!
I believe your despicable actions fall into the category of "OBSTRUCTION OF JUSTICE" !!
A City resident has come forward and told me of an ADDITIONAL act of VANDALISM that occurred to one of the basketball standards at BI-CENTENNIAL PARK; this time causing damage of approximately $1,100.00.
According to information provided to me by the Carver County Sheriff's Office, there, again; was NO REPORT of this ADDITIONAL ACT of VANDALISM AGAINST THE CITY made to their Department. Please provide information why, and an explanation for; the City NOT REPORTING this ADDITIONAL act of VANDALISM to the Carver County Sheriff's Office for investigation and criminal prosecution.
Also, please advise the identity of the perpetrator(s) of said act of this ADDITIONAL VANDALISMcommitted AGAINST CITY PROPERTY.
In the incident described above, was any form of restitution received by the City ? If so, how much restitution was received by the City, and from whom was the restitution received ?
Additionally, in my February 14, 2024 e-mail to you and after your TOTALLY IGNORING my previous request(s), I asked you ONCE AGAIN; about the FABRICATION and TRANSMISSION of an OFFICIAL CITY DOCUMENT, sent to me, a CITY RESIDENT; via e-mail; that KNOWINGLY CONTAINED FALSE and FRAUDULENT INFORMATION !!
Said e-mail from the City identified YOU as being the author and said e-mail contained your 'electronic signature'.
1.) Was your sending of that DEVIOUS, DECEPTIVE and HEINOUS act of FABRICATING a FRAUDULENT City e-mail that contained FALSE and FRAUDULENT INFORMATION done because it was YOUR SOLE DECISION and ACTION, or were you DIRECTED to do so by 'other' City Officials ?
2.) If you were DIRECTED to do so by those 'other' City Officials, please provide the identity of that/those 'other' HAMBURG CITY OFFICIAL/OFFICIALS.
You are reminded of your deleterious disregard concerning your 'OBLIGATIONS' and'RESPONSIBILITIES' REQUIRED OF YOU by MINNESOTA STATUTE 609.43 - MISCONDUCT OF PUBLIC OFFICIAL OR EMPLOYEE because of your position as a HAMBURG CITY
OFFICIAL.
Your past, DOCUMENTED MISCONDUCT and INAPPROPRIATE BEHAVIOR, not to mention you being a 'MAJOR PLAYER' in a MASSIVE 'COVER UP' SCHEME in the CITY OF HAMBURG, constitute WILLFUL VIOLATIONS of the statute cited, and SUBJECTS YOU to the PENALTIES
as outlined in the cited statute.
I'm certain that you think that it will NEVER HAPPEN because of the 'protection' against CRIMINAL PROSECUTION that you, and your fellow CITY OFFICIALS firmly believe that
you have in place; making you a pseudo 'TEFLON DON'.
But, THINK ABOUT THIS: You are also risking either being TERMINATED or being
FORCIBLY REMOVED FROM OFFICE and LOSING ALL OF YOUR ACCUMULATED
BENEFITS AS A RESULT OF YOUR ILLEGAL MISCONDUCT !!
That action wouldn't 'look good' on ANYBODY's Resume' !!
And in addition to subjecting yourself to substantial monetary fines, there's the 'Crowbar Hotel', as well.
Think about it.
2023 MINNESOTA STATUTES
609.43 MISCONDUCT OF PUBLIC OFFICER OR EMPLOYEE
"......... for which no other sentence is specifically provided by law, may be sentenced to imprisonment for not more than 364 days or to payment of a fine of not more than $3,000.00, or both."
I obviously (and erroneously) have given you much more 'credit' than I ever should have.
Richard Odoms
150 Jacob Street
Hamburg, Minnesota 55339
Property Status
From: Jeremy Gruenhagen
Wed, Jan 31, 10:27 AM
to me
Mr. Odoms, thank you for your below email dated January 31st which the city interprets as you seeking data under the Minnesota Government Data Practices Act as to the status of the property. The below is a summary of the status of the settlement/real estate dispute which should answer your concerns/inquiries relating to the property:
To effectuate the settlement agreement entered into between the City of Hamburg (the “City”) and Steven Trebesch, Tammy Trebesch, Triple T Services, LLC (collectively the “Trebesches”), resolving the litigation matter pending in Carver County District Court, Court File No. 10-CV-19-1091 (the “Action”), the City approved a minor subdivision of real property parcels subject to the Action by resolution on November 21, 2023.
On December 20, 2023, counsel for the City conveyed copies of proposed quit claim deeds and a proposed easement agreement to counsel for the Trebesches along with copies of legal descriptions for the subject parcels provided by Kurt Nelson of E.G. Rud & Sons, Inc.
On January 3, 2024, counsel for the City sought an update from counsel for the Trebeshes on the status of the approval and execution of the aforementioned deeds and easement agreement.
On January 4, 2024, counsel for the Trebesches indicated that the Trebesches had issues with the proposed easement agreement language.
On January 4, 2024, counsel for the City requested that counsel for the Trebesches send a proposed amended easement agreement reflecting terms acceptable to the Trebesches for the City’s consideration.
On January 9, 2024, attorney Jason Kuboushek, co-counsel for the City in the Action, inquired of counsel for the Trebesches as to the status of the approval of the proposed deeds and proposed easement agreement.
On January 19, 2024, counsel for the City again reached out to counsel for the Trebesches seeking an update on the status of the approval of the proposed deeds and seeking proposed language from the Trebesches related to the easement agreement.
On January 29, 2024, counsel for the City again reached out to counsel for the Trebesches seeking an update on the status of the approval of the proposed deeds and seeking proposed language from the Trebesches related to the easement agreement.
On January 29, 2024, counsel for the Tresbesches responded indicating that he would circulate a proposed amended easement agreement upon receiving approval to do so from his clients.
Jeremy Gruenhagen
City Clerk-Treasurer
P.O. Box 248
181 Broadway Avenue
Hamburg, MN 55339
952-467-3232
Data Request
Jeremy Gruenhagen
Tue, Jan 30, 3:13 PM
to me
Mr. Odoms, the following is intended to respond to your posed question no. 5 in your January 4th and January 24th emails to me which is the following:
“5. According to the Carver County Property records that I just viewed, it appears that the title of the portion of the Trebesch property recently allegedly acquired by the City, remains in the Trebesch family name.
With the impending probability of a ‘plowbleable snow’ this weekend and also possible next week, because the City is not the legal owner of the property, it follows that the City is precluded from addressing that property for ANY reason and, were the City or their ‘agent’ to do so; would be guilty of TRESPASS and in VIOLATION OF MINNESOTA STATUTE 609.605.
How is the City addressing this property dispute issue that was RESOLVED nearly ONE YEAR AGO ?”
The City’s response is based upon data and is governed by the Minnesota Data Practices Act. The City received fee title to the real property upon which it intends to presently store snow by way of a quit claim deed dated March 3, 1965, and recorded on April 26, 1965 as Document No. 107775, Book 85 of Deeds, Page 138, in the Office of the Carver County Recorder. This City’s ownership of this parcel was confirmed by the district court during the litigation of the Trebesch claims pursuant to an Order and Memorandum filed on March 2, 2022, in Court File No. 10-CV-91-1091.
Thank you,
Jeremy Gruenhagen
City Clerk-Treasurer
P.O. Box 248
181 Broadway Avenue
Hamburg, MN 55339
952-467-3232
Sheriff-Records
Thu, Feb 1, 9:24 AM
to me
Richard,
Going back to 2017, I was able to find 3 incidents. There are 20 pages of data so the cost will be $5.00, cash or check.
You may pick this up Monday-Friday 8-430 at the Sheriff’s Office.
Thank you,
Emily Kulak
Records Specialist #637
Carver County Sheriff’s Office
606 East Fourth Street
Chaska, MN 55318
P: 952-361-1212
Sent: Thursday, February 1, 2024
Subject: Re: Hamburg Records Request
EXTERNAL EMAIL: Do not click any links or open any attachments unless you trust the sender and know the content is safe.
Jeremy Gruenhagen
Attachments
Feb 1, 2024
to me
Mr. Odoms, thank you for your below email dated January 31st relating to questions that concern the vandalism inquiries which you first raised in your December 29, 2023, email to me. The City wishes to provide responsive data to you if allowed to do so under the Minnesota Government Data Practices Act as providing responsive answers to your questions is possible only if data exists from which answers to your questions would be derived and if the City is allowed to disclose the data to you under the Minnesota Government Data Practices Act.
In your first email you indicated that you were seeking a time period of “say, the past ten years.” The City does need to understand the time period during which you are seeking responsive information from the City from municipal data. Is it the past ten years? Could you please confirm to me the time period that you are seeking for the City to go back to review municipal data to see if there is any data that would be responsive to answer your questions? Once we understand the time period, I can then provide you with an estimate of the time it would take for me to search for and retrieve the data to be able to answer your questions and for which the City would charge you a fee for my doing so. The City wishes to be fully cooperative with you but does also need cooperation from you to respond to your inquiries. The City also requests that you review the attached Data Practices Act policy and complete the attached data practices act form specifying the data that you are seeking answers to your questions from as answers will need to come from municipal data.
Thank You & Have a Great Night,
Jeremy Gruenhagen
City Clerk-Treasurer
P.O. Box 248
181 Broadway Avenue
Hamburg, MN 55339
952-467-3232
Because MINNESOTA'S HIGHEST OFFICIALS (Walz & Ellison) REFUSED to take any action about the GROSS MISCONDUCT and
CORRUPTION that was taking place with PUBLIC OFFICIALS in CARVER COUNTY INCLUDING, and INVOLVING; CARVER
COUNTY ATTORNEY MARK METZ and his DEPUTY COUNTY ATTORNEY PETER IVY, or the 'COVER UP' that was
taking place INVOLVING the OFFICE OF LAWYER'S PROFESSIONAL RESPONSIBILITY, I reported my
information to (former) MINNESOTA SUPREME COURT JUSTICE LORI GILDAE. (The OFFICE OF
LAWYER'S PROFESSIONAL RESPONSIBILITY is DIRECTLY ACCOUNTABLE
to the MINNESOTA SUPREME COURT.)
I soon received a letter from the (then) COMMISSIONER OF THE MIINNESOTA SUPREME COURT telling me that my WRITTEN
'REPORT' to CHIEF JUSTICE GILDAE HAD BEEN INTERCEPTED and WOULD NOT BE FORWARDED to
CHIEF JUSTICE GILDAE !! TWO SIMILAR LETTERS were sent (11-3-23 & 12-18-23) to the current
CHIEF JUSTICE & other SUPREME COURT JUSTICES with NO RESPONSE !!
In addition to NOT RESPONDING to my letter to him, apparently the CURRENT MINNESOTA SUPREME COURT COMMISSIONER
TIMOTHY J. DROSKE, is DOING THE SAME THING; my (UNANSWERED) letter sent to him appears below:
Donations For This Very Worthwhile Organization May Be Sent To:
MINNESOTA SHERIFF'S ASSOCIATION
P.O. BOX 17005 * ST. PAUL, MINNESOTA 55117-9928
"PUBLIC OFFICIALS BEHAVING BADLY"
EXPOSING 'DIRTY' PUBLIC OFFICIALS
IN MINNE$OTA'$ WEALTHIE$T COUNTY !!
DATE: Feb 5, 2024 - 8:10 AM
TO: Hamburg City Clerk/Treasurer Jeremy Gruenhagen
SUBJECT: Vandalism - Bi-Centennial Park
1. I am still awaiting your 'Yes or No' answer to my numerous inquiries as to whether or not you told a City resident that the vandalism to the tree(s) in Bi-Centennial Park, believed to have been caused by means of a 'claw' hammer on or about July 31, 2018; was caused by the son of Hamburg Mayor Christopher M. Lund.
2. It is my understanding that additional vandalism occurred to various buildings at Bi-Centennial Park on or about July 31, 2018, and that said acts of vandalism were believed to have been caused by means of a 'claw' hammer.
Who was/were the perpetrator(s) of said vandalism to those various City buildings and what criminal action was taken/authorized by the City against the perpetrator(s) for their act of vandalism of City property ?
3. Regarding the FELONY LEVEL of vandalism, amounting to approximately $1,400.00; of the City sign at Bi-Centennial Park on or about May 26, 2020, who was/were the perpetrator(s) of said vandalism and what criminal action was taken/authorized by the City against the perpetrator(s) for their act of vandalism of City property ?
4. It also is my understanding that damage to a locking door handle at the Hamburg Community Hall/City Shops occurred on or about October 2, 2017 and that the City sustained the loss (theft) of certain items as a result. If 'forced entry' occurred, as one would believe to have taken place; I, personally; would classify that action as a burglary.
Who was/were the perpetrator(s) of said burglary, what items were stolen, what is the total value of all items stolen, what is/was the cost of repair/replacement of the locking door handle that was damaged and what criminal action was taken/authorized by the City against the perpetrator(s) for their acts of vandalism, apparent burglary and theft of items from the City owned building ?
5. The Carver County Sheriff's Office has NO REPORT of any acts of vandalism having taken place at the Service Memorial in Bi-Centennial Park.
It is common knowledge that juveniles have been seen climbing on, and vandalizing the statues. In fact, the rifles of one of the statues had the barrel of a gun held by one of the statues, literally 'broken off'.
Why wasn't a formal report of vandalism made to the Carver County Sheriff's Office for this act of vandalism of City property, who was/were the perpetrator(s) of said vandalism and what criminal action was taken/authorized by the City against the perpetrator(s) for their act of vandalism ?
In any of the incidents described above, was any form of restitution received by the City and if so, how much restitution was received by the City, and from whom was the restitution received ?
With the exception of item (1) above, did ANY of the other incidents described above; involve the children of ANY of the ELECTED PUBLIC OFFICIALS of the CITY OF HAMBURG ?
The appropriate completed 'Request For Information' forms, as required by the City of Hamburg; are attached with this
e-mail request for PUBLIC information.
I await your response and caution you to receive, consider and respond to these inquiries with the same degree of seriousness with which the inquiries are sent.
ANY ATTEMPT to 'STONEWALL' the providing of the information requested herein, as has taken place so many times in the past and as recently as January 26, 2024 and January 29, 2024, would NOT be in the best interests of the City of Hamburg or its PUBLIC OFFICIALS, is NOT ACCEPTABLE and will be dealt with SWIFTLY, HARSHLY and DIRECTLY.
Richard Odoms
150 Jacob Street
Hamburg, Minnesota
55339
https://swipesimple.com/links/lnk_f04a527a
SEE CITY'S RESPONSE RECEIVED FEBRUARY 14, 2024 BELOW
RESPONSE RECEIVED BY THE CITY OF HAMBURG ON
02-14-24 IN RESPONSE TO THE ABOVE QUESTIONS:
"The City does not have any data in its possession regarding your specific above questions and for that reason, the City will
not be providing to you any responsive answers to your above questions."
Jeremy Gruenhagen, Hamburg City Clerk-Treasurer
COVER UP:
"A usually concerted effort to keep an illegal or unethical act or situation from being made public."
CORRUPTION:
"Dishonest or
illegal behavior
especially by powerful people;such as government
officials."
I'm PUBLICLY RELEASING OVER 150 PAGES Of DOCUMENTS, Many Of Which Have NEVER BEEN SEEN BEFORE And Include RUDE, VULGAR, And DEMEANING TEXT
MESSAGES Sent Between HAMBURG CITY OFFICIALS 'TARGETING' A CITY
EMPLOYEE WHO THEY WERE TRYING TO FORCE TO QUIT !!
(SOUND FAMILIAR ?? It WILL When You Read My Book !!)
Extracted From OVER FIFTY PAGES Of INTERNAL
CITY DOCUMENTS That I've Obtained !!
LYING, DISHONESTY, DECEPTION OR COMMITTING ANY OTHER
ILLEGAL OR UNETHICAL ACT IS BAD ENOUGH. BUT WHEN
CONFRONTED, ATTEMPTING TO COVER UP ONE'S DEVIOUS
ACTIONS WITH USING OBVIOUSLY DUPLICITOUS MEANS,
SHOWS THE TRUE CHARACTER OF THE PERSON INVOLVED !!
I've Always Wondered:
WHAT KIND OF PERSON WOULD
'SELL THEIR SOUL' ??!!
Now; I Know; and We ALL Know.
How 'BAD ' Does This 'SMELL' ??
E-mail Received From The City Of Hamburg
On Thursday, January 4, 10:21 AM
Mr. Odoms,
Thank you for your email inquiry seeking answers to questions from the city as opposed to seeking the production of municipal data. The city is not in possession of any data that would contain answers to your below questions. The city is unable to provide answers to your questions. The city would refer you to the county for data that may contain answers to your questions.
Thank you for your inquiry.
Sincerely,
Jeremy Gruenhagen,
HAMBURG CITY CLERK-TREASURER
WHAT ARE POLICE ?
Police" - whether active, part time or retired - are those who, at one point in their lives, wrote a blanck check made payable to "THE CITY HE or SHE SERVES" for an amount up to AND including their life That isan honor. Ad there are way too many people in this country today, wh no longer understand that fact.
SUPPORT YOUR LOCAL POLICE !!.
ARROGANCE & MISPLACED PRIORITIES
There's Something SERIOUSLY WRONG With The ARROGANT PUBLIC OFFICIALS Of The CITY OF HAMBURG Who DON’T COMPLY With The MINNESOTA GOVERNOR’S
ORDER To LOWER FLAGS To HALF STAFF In HONOR Of The TWO FALLEN
POLICE OFFICERS And PARAMEDIC KILLED IN THE LINE OF DUTY,
Yet; They Can ENSURE THAT THE CITY HALL RECYCLING
BIN IS SET OUT FOR PICK UP !!
Once Again, The City Is
At Minnesota Governor Tim Walz.
CRIMINAL ACTIVITY IN HAMBURG
Appears To Be
COVERED UP BY CITY OFFICIALS
Because Of
WHO IS INVOLVED !!
I'M ON IT !!!
You'll Be SHOCKED When You Find Out
WHO ELSE IS INVOLVED !!
CORRUPTION:
DISHONEST, FRAUDULENT or even CRIMINAL ACTS of an individual
or organization, using
ENTRUSTED AUTHORITY or POWER
to make a personal gain or other
UNETHICAL or ILLEGAL
BENEFITS.
It's NO WONDER Why The CURRENT And FORMER HAMBURG CITY OFFICIALS Worked So
INTENTLY To PREVENT Me From Being
Elected As The Mayor Of Hamburg
In The Last Election !!
MUCH MORE INFORMATION & DETAILS AVAILABLE AT:
IT TOOK THE CITY OF HAMBURG THREE DAYS TO 'GET IN STEP' WITH THE REST OF THE STATE !!
RESPONSE RECEIVED BY THE CITY OF HAMBURG ON 02-14-24 IN RESPONSE TO THE ABOVE QUESTIONS:
"The City does not have any data in its possession regarding your specific above questions and for that reason, the City will not be providing to you any responsive answers to your above questions."
Jeremy Gruenhagen, Hamburg City Clerk-Treasurer
WHAT KIND OF PERSON WOULD 'SELL THEIR SOUL' ??!!
Now; We ALL Know.
Lying, dishonesty, deception and collusion are despicable & unforgiveable acts.
"It is almost always the 'cover-up', rather than the event;
that causes the trouble." Howard Baker
I REQUESTED TO VIEW VARIOUS OFFICIAL CITY DOCUMENTS OF THE CITY OF HAMBURG AS WELL AS AGAIN ATTEMPTED TO OBTAIN ADDITIONAL PUBLIC INFORMATION, THAT THE CITY HAS PREVIOUSLY REFUSED TO PROVIDE; REGARDING VARIOUS ACTS OF CRIMINAL ACTIVITY THAT HAVE
TAKEN PLACE IN THE CITY, BUT STILL CONTINUES TO
REFUSE TO PROVIDE AND, INSTEAD;
THE CITY CONTINUES TO 'COVER UP' !!
The City's Latest Responses To My Most Recent Requests for Details And Information
As Shown Below, Appear In Times New Roman BOLD MAROON ITALIC Print.
DATE: Fri, Feb 23, 4:07 PM
TO: City of Hamburg
SUBJECT: Inspection of Documents
Jeremy:
FIRST; beginning with the start of my four year City Council term on January 1, 2013 up to and including this date, February 23, 2024; please assemble, for my inspection; an accumulation/collection of ANY and ALL documents of ANY kind and in ANY format, whether written or electronic including, but not limited to; notes, letters, telephone calls, e-mails, text messages, (particularly communications of ANY KIND among or between Hamburg City Officials), as well as during City Council meetings, contained in City Council Meeting Agendas, contained in City Council Meeting 'Minutes'; in which ANY reference what-so ever, is made of, to or about me personally, and in which ANY reference what-so-ever is made of, to or about my recently published book, "PUBLIC OFFICIALS BEHAVING BADLY" and in which ANY reference what-so-ever is made of, to or about my Websites, and/or ANY and ALL associated Webpages of those three Websites.
"The City is in the process of gathering responsive data for you to inspect. Your above data request seeks a very large amount of responsive data to segregate. I will keep you posted as to when the City is able to produce the responsive data to you to inspect. A portion of the data you are seeking is non-public data including confidential or private data on individuals as well as attorney-client privileged data. The City will only produce for your inspection data that does not fall into one of these categories."
SECOND, the City of Hamburg has stated and maintains through its City Clerk/Treasurer; that it has no information whatsoever regarding the identity of perpetrators of acts of vandalism, and other criminal acts, committed against the City of Hamburg and against the dignity of the City's residents.
This is nothing more than a 'RUSE' and 'COVER-UP' by HAMBURG CITY OFFICIALS trying to PREVENT THE TRUTH of what took place FROM BEING PUBLICLY KNOWN !!
"The above statements are not seeking responsive data and therefore the City is not responding to the above comments by you as no response is required under the Minnesota Government Data Practices Act. No responsive data exists."
A.) The act of damage done to a City owned tree in the City owned BI-CENTENNIAL PARK, wherein the bark of the tree had been 'stripped off'; by means of what is believed to have been a 'claw hammer'.
Having personal and other knowledge of the vandalism to the tree in BI-CENTENNIAL PARK that had taken place, the HAMBURG CITY CLERK/TREASURER reportedly, and personally; told a City resident that the perpetrator of this act of vandalism to the tree in BI-CENTENNIAL PARK was committed by a child of HAMBURG CITY MAYOR CHRISTOPHER M. LUND, but that the City 'WANTED TO KEEP IT QUIET' because of the IDENTITY OF THE PERPETRATOR(s) !!
"The above statements are not seeking responsive data and therefore the City is not responding to the above comments by you as no response is required under the Minnesota Government Data Practices Act. No responsive data exists."
B.) Doors to buildings located at BI-CENTENNIAL PARK were also vandalized; the damage sustained to the doors likewise appeared to have also been committed using a 'claw' hammer, the same or similar to the one used to vandalize the tree(s) at BI-CENTENNIAL PARK.
"The above statements are not seeking responsive data and therefore the City is not responding to the above question by you as no response is required under the Minnesota Government Data Practices Act. No responsive data exists."
If, perchance; restitution for the vandalism to the City's electronic sign was made to the City; who/what is the source, and the amount; of that restitution ?
"The City responds as follows: No responsive data to your above request exists."
Because of the similarity of the instrument used in the vandalism of the tree in BI-CENTENNIAL PARK, do you have ANY personal, or other 'first hand' knowledge, as to the identity who the perpetrator(s) was that caused the vandalism to the doors of the building(s) as BI-CENTENNIAL PARK ?
"The above question is not seeking responsive data and therefore the City is not responding to the above question by you as no response is required under the Minnesota Government Data Practices Act. No responsive data exists."
If, perchance; restitution for the vandalism to the City's electronic sign was made to the City; who/what is the source, and the amount; of that restitution ?
"The City responds as follows: No responsive data to your above request exists."
C.) Regarding the reported $1,400.00 vandalism done to the electronic sign at BI-CENTENNIAL PARK, do you have ANY personal, or other 'first hand' knowledge, as to the identity who the perpetrator(s) was that caused the vandalism of the City's electronic sign?
"The above question is not seeking responsive data and therefore the City is not responding to the above question by you as no response is required under the Minnesota Government Data Practices Act. No responsive data exists."
If, perchance; restitution for the vandalism to the City's electronic sign was made to the City; who/what is the source, and the amount; of that restitution ?
D.) Regarding the reported $1,100.00 vandalism done at the basketball court at BI-CENTENNIAL PARK, do you have ANY personal, or other 'first hand' knowledge, as to the identity who the perpetrator(s) was that caused the vandalism to the City's basketball court ?
"The above question is not seeking responsive data and therefore the City is not responding to the above question by you as no response is required under the Minnesota Government Data Practices Act. No responsive data exits."
If, perchance; restitution for the vandalism to the City's basketball court was made to the City; who/what is the source and amount of that restitution ?
"The City responds as follows: No responsive data to your above request exists."
E.) Regarding the UNREPORTED vandalism done to the rifle being held by one of the statues at the Service Memorial at BI-CENTENNIAL PARK, do you have ANY personal, or other 'first hand' knowledge, as to the identity who the perpetrator(s) was that caused the vandalism to the Service Memorial ?
"The above question is not seeking responsive data and therefore the City is not responding to the above question by you as no response is required under the Minnesota Government Data Practices Act. No responsive data exists."
If, perchance; restitution for the vandalism at the City's Service Memorial, who/what is the source and amount of that restitution ?
"The City responds as follows: No responsive data to your above request exists."
F.) Moving right along to the HAMBURG COMMUNITY HALL/CITY SHOPS BUILDING, do you have ANY personal, or other 'first hand' knowledge, as to the identity who the perpetrator(s) was/were that burglarized the building and stole various items, from; and owned by; the CITY OF HAMBURG ?
"The City does have data in its possession that identifies an incident occurring on October 2, 2017, as it relates to damage to the banquet hall and theft of tools/damage to property. The identified perpetrators are unknown. No data exists as to the specific identification of the stolen items other than there were tools stolen. The November 14, 2017, city council meeting minutes provides “The time and cost of repairs and the replacement of tools taken for a total of $272.17.” The City was reimbursed this amount by all parties as set forth in the November 14, 2017, meeting minutes. The incident was closed by MDT on October 2, 2017. The Carver County Sheriff’s service call report provides “the City Administrator stated he would be handling all issues with the parent who placed the security deposit as a civil issue."
If, perchance; restitution was made to the City for the burglary and vandalism to the City's COMMUNITY HALL/CITY SHOPS for the as a result of the burglary and thefts that occurred there, who/what is the source and amount of that restitution ?
"The City responds as follows: No responsive data to your above request exists."
G.) Do you have ANY personal, or other 'first hand' knowledge or information about vandalism or other criminal or suspicious acts committed in the City of Hamburg that were not reported to the Carver County Sheriff's Office ?
"The above question is not seeking responsive data and therefore the City is not responding to the above question by you as no response is required under the Minnesota Government Data Practices Act. No responsive data exists."
If so, what are they and why weren't those criminal acts reported ?
"The above question is not seeking responsive data and therefore the City is not responding to the above question by you as no response is required under the Minnesota Government Data Practices Act. No responsive data exists."
THIRD, I'm STILL WAITING to receive the City's explanation as to why the Carver County Sheriff's Office was never notified of vandalism to City owned property.
"The above comment is not seeking responsive data and therefore the City is not responding to the above comments by you as no response is required under the Minnesota Government Data Practices Act. No responsive data exists."
Because I am seeking to only 'inspect' the information, documents, etc. referenced in this e-mail request, according to the forms provided to me, there will be NO CHARGE for me to inspect said documents and information referenced above.
Please advise me when the requested information will be made available for my viewing.
Should I desire a copy of any particular document, I agree to pay the City of Hamburg the 'rate' outlined on the completed and attached 'Request Forms'; $0.25/page.
Sincerely,
Richard Odoms
150 Jacob Street
Hamburg, Minnesota 55339
And then, there's the following City's response received on April 4th, nearly SIX WEEKS AFTER MY INITIAL REQUEST; and their continued effor to hinder my viewing of PUBLIC INFORMATION:
Mr. Odoms,
The city has completed its process of assembling responsive data for your inspection pursuant to the voluminous data practices act requests that you made below on February 23, 2024. Please see the below more specific responses (in blue) to your individual requests.
Data will be available for your inspection at the City Attorney’s Office of Melchert, Hubert, Sjodin P.L.L.P., 121 West Main Street, Suite 200, Waconia, MN 55387 as of Monday, April 15, 2024. Please contact City Attorney Kelly Dohm either by email or phone to schedule a time when you can inspect the responsive data at her law office in Waconia.
Thank You & Have a Great Weekend,
Jeremy Gruenhagen
City Clerk-Treasurer
RESPONSE RECEIVED FROM THE CITY OF HAMBURG ON 02-14-24 IN RESPONSE TO QUESTIONS SUBMITTED TO THE CITY SHOWN ON THIS WEBPAGE:
"The City does not have any data in its possession regarding your specific (above) questions and for that reason, the City will
not be providing to you
any responsive answers
to your above questions."
Jeremy Gruenhagen,
Hamburg City Clerk-Treasurer
WHAT KIND OF
PERSON WOULD
'SELL THEIR SOUL' ?
Now; We ALL Know.
WHAT'S TAKEN PLACE IN THE CITY OF HAMBURG INVOLVING
ITS CITY OFFICIALS IS BAD ENOUGH; BUT THOSE SAME
CITY OFFICIALS ATTEMPTING TO 'COVER UP' WHAT'S
TAKEN PLACE MAKES THEIR ACTIONS
EVEN MORE EGREGIOUS !!
The ALL Really BELONG IN JAIL !!
"The fact of the Watergate 'COVER-UP' is not nearly as interesting as the
step into making the 'COVER UP'. And when you understand the step,
you understand that Richard Nixon lied. That he was a criminal."
Bob Woodward, WASHINGTON POST INVESTIGATIVE REPORTER
From The Website Of The FEDERAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION (F.B.I.)
PUBLIC CORRUPTION:
"THE FBI's TOP CRIMINAL INVESTIGATIVE PRORITY BECAUSE IT POSES A FUNDAMENTAL THREAT TO
OUR NATIONAL SECURITY
AND WAY OF LIFE."
To Order My Book
"PUBLIC OFFICIALS
BEHAVING BADLY"
HAMBURG PUBLIC OFFICIALS
ARE MORALLY CORRUPT*
"Behaving in a way that is morally wrong, especially
by doing dishonest or illegal things in
return for money or power."
THAT'S JUST WRONG !!
Early on in my book
"PUBLIC OFFICIALS BEHAVING BADLY",
I clearly identify HAMBURG CITY CLERK/TREASURER
JEREMY GRUENHAGEN as a PERSON I COULDN'T
TRUST; the following appears on Page 11 of my book,
"PUBLIC OFFICIALS BEHAVING BADLY":
"I quickly learned that he was a person, a CITY OFFICIAL,
yet; that I COULD NOT, and WOULD NOT, EVER
TRUST AGAIN !! I don't trust him to this day !
He is the SINGLE PERSON that I hold TOTALLY RESPONSIBLE for the CHAOS that began during the last
two and a half years of my City Council term and
how the resultant, deleterious consequences
of his actions back then, have seriously,
and NEGATIVELY impacted
OUR ENTIRE CITY to this day."
This Whole Matter Of
GROSS MISCONDUCT & CORRUPTION
By
PUBLIC OFFICIALS
Initially Only Involved The
MORALLY CORRUPT*
PUBLIC OFFICIALS
In The
CITY OF HAMBURG
And Has Been
TOTALLY IGNORED !!
(I Have NOT Been Able To Locate ANY Such Discussion By Listening
To The Recordings Of The City Council Meetings !!)
What's Taken Place With
HAMBURG CITY OFFICIALS
Eventually
EXPANDED
To The Point Where It Also Now Includes
PUBLIC OFFICIALS
Within The
CARVER COUNTY
ATTORNEY'S OFFICE
In
MINNE$OTA'$
WEALTHIE$T COUNTY
And Eventually Ended Up Involving Additional
'HIGH RANKING'
PUBLIC OFFICIALS
In AT LEAST THREE Other
STATE AGENCIES !!
Learn more about what took place when all of this began back in the fall of 2019 and CONTINUES to this day !!
From The Website Of The FEDERAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION:
PUBLIC CORRUPTION:
"THE FBI's TOP CRIMINAL INVESTIGATIVE PRORITY BECAUSE IT POSES A FUNDAMENTAL THREAT TO
OUR NATIONAL SECURITY AND WAY OF LIFE."
The F.B.I. Also Investigates Violations Of Federal Law By Public Officials At The Federal, State, And Local Level Of Government.
WHEN MIGHT WE SEE THEM IN THE
HAMBURG, CARVER COUNTY & STATE CAPITOL AREAS ??
THE CITY OF HAMBURG APPARENTLY HAS FINALLY REALIZED THAT I HAVE NO INTENTION OF ABANDONING MY RELENTLESS SEARCH FOR THE TRUTH AND FACTS ABOUT THE CORRUPTION AND GROSS MISCONDUCT THAT'S
TAKEN/TAKING PLACE IN THE CITY OF HAMBURG, AND SUBSEQUENT 'COVER UP', BY ITS PUBLIC OFFICIALS AND OTHERS (Oh, YES; There ARE 'OTHERS' !). SO, AS AN ACT OF 'RETALLIATION' FOR MY AGGRESSIVE (and PRODUCTIVE) DILLIGENCE TO FERRET OUT, AND EXPOSE; THE TRUE FACTS OF WHAT'S TAKEN PLACE AS WELL AS WHO WAS/IS INVOLVED. THE CITY, SPECIFICALLY CITY CLERK/TREASURER JEREMY GRUENHAGEN; DECIDES TO SEND ME THE FOLLOWING LETTER, THINKING (WRONGULLY) THAT THEY WILL 'DERAIL' MY EFFORTS.
IT TOOK THE CITY OF HAMBURG
ELEVEN DAYS TO RESPOND TO THIS REQUEST !!
DATE: Mar 9, 2:14 PM
TO: City of Hamburg
SUBJECT: Letter Received Dated March 7, 2024
Referring to your statement, "The City of Hamburg has received a request for public and/or non-public data that may be in your possession as it relates to your current or former time on the City Council.".........
Before I, or anyone else, would (or should) even contemplate providing ANY response to your letter, there are serious questions that logically deserve and require adequate, full and complete answers, judicious explanations as well as pertinent, legitimate information, from the City of Hamburg.
Those questions that beg to be answered are:
1.) WHO is requesting the information, and
2.) WHAT is the identity of other persons that have received a similar letter from the City of Hamburg, and
3.) WHAT is the reason for this information being requested, and
4) WHY, in my case; is this information now being requested SO LONG AFTER MY CITY COUNCIL TERM
EXPIRED on DECEMBER 31, 2016 ??
Richard Odoms
150 Jacob Street
Hamburg, Minnesota 55339
The CITY CLERK/TREASURER
Is Paid TENS of THOUSANDS
Of TAXPAYER DOLLARS
ANNUALLY !!
How Many Time Have You Driven By City Hall And Seen The Above ??
Why Isn't The City 'Open'
M-F 8AM - 4:30PM Like
Normal Businesses Are ??
FROM: Jeremy Gruenhagen
DATE: Mar 20, 2024 - 12:02 PM
Mr. Odoms,
Thank you for your email to me dated March 9, 2024. The reason that you received the written request for data that may be in your possession is that the City has a statutory obligation to gather data pursuant to Chapter 13 of the Minnesota Statutes to enable the City to respond to your previous data request that you sent to me via email on February 23, 2024. You very likely have responsive data to your own data practices act request in your possession and the City has a legal obligation to gather this data from you to produce to you for your own inspection. All former and current City council members since the date of your request which is January 1, 2013, through the present time have been provided by the City with the same letter. The City is gathering responsive data to produce to you for your inspection from both former and current City council members. The City requests your cooperation in this regard. Please feel free to call me, email me, or come up to City hall to coordinate the most efficient way you can provide the requested data in your possession to the City.
Thanks & Have a Great Day,
Jeremy Gruenhagen
City Clerk-Treasurer
P.O. Box 248
181 Broadway Avenue
Hamburg, MN 55339
952-467-3232
DATE: Mar 20, 2024 - 1:23 PM
TO: Jeremy Gruenhagen, City of Hamburg
During my four years as a Hamburg City Council member, all of the City related documents and information provided to me, by the City; were contained in a series of three ring binders. (You perhaps recall me always having a large, white, 3" ring binder with me, laying on the table where I was seated; at all City Council meetings.)
As I recall, soon after the expiration of my four year Hamburg City Council term on January 1, 2017, the City documents and information provided to me by the City during the preceding four years and contained in those multiple three ring binders, was removed and taken either to Kinko's in Chanhassen (or more likely; to the UPS Store in Waconia) and deposited in their 'shredding containers' to be shredded.
Once that was accomplished, the empty three ring binders were given to Robin Peterson for use in her Day Care business.
To the best of my knowledge, I no longer have (if I ever DID have), and haven't had for several years since the expiration of my City Council term; any 'non-public' 'City data' in my possession. There's also the consideration of the seven year Statute of Limitations which EXPIRED on JANUARY 1, 2024.
In order for me to have any such 'non-public' data, AFTER my City Council term had EXPIRED on January 1, 2017; the City would have had to provide it to me which, of course; would be a violation of the Minnesota Data Practices act.
In my February 23, 2024 initial request to the City to inspect any City documents as described in my e-mail to you that date, of particular, additional interest to me; are any and all electronic /messages/exchanges, of ANY kind; between City Officials/employees, similar to the 'treasure trove' of multiple pages of 'telling' and 'revealing' City documents given to Brandon Bracht, by the City; upon his departure from City employment.
Richard Odoms
150 Jacob Street
Hamburg, Minnesota 55339
VIOLATION OF 18 U.S. CODE § 1001
The crime of making a false statement is governed by 18 U.S. Code § 1001. According to the statute, a violation includes anyone who willfully and knowingly:
Falsifies, conceals, or covers up by any trick, scheme, or device a material fact;
HOW MANY TIMES HAVE YOU SEEN THE WORDS BELOW THAT ARE HIGHLIGHTED
IN RED & UNDERLINED, THAT YOU'VE PREVIOUSLY READ ON THIS WEBSITE ??
Makes any materially false, fictitious, or fraudulent statement or representation; or
Makes or uses any false writing or document knowing the same to contain any materially false, fictitious, or fraudulent statement or entry.
In other words, there are three broad ways to violate this statute. The first is to conceal a material fact through fraud. This can occur without a person directly lying to the FBI. For example, handing over written documents after secretly removing an incriminating one could count as a violation of the statute.
The second prong of the statute relates directly to false statements. It is unlawful to make any materially false or fraudulent statement or representation. This goes beyond a direct lie and also covers indirectly misrepresenting the truth.
Finally, the third section covers non-verbal acts that are covered by the statute. These include providing the FBI with any forced or false document knowing it includes a materially false statement.
CONSEQUENCES OF A FEDERAL CONVICTION
The price you might pay for a single false statement made to the FBI can be steep. This offense is a federal crime and a felony, meaning a conviction could haunt you for the rest of your life.
If you are convicted of making a false statement, you could face up to five years in federal prison. This penalty could be extended to a maximum of eight years if your misstatement relates to any act of international or domestic terrorism.
Time in prison is not the only potential consequence. There are also collateral consequences that can follow a conviction for making a false statement. Given that this offense is a felony, you could spend the rest of your life identified as a convicted felon. This could cost you your right to vote or own a firearm.
A conviction could also make it challenging to obtain housing or employment. Prospective employers and landlords routinely make use of criminal background checks when making a decision, and many will think twice before accepting your application with a felony conviction on your record.
Finally, making a false statement is a crime of moral turpitude. Because you have been convicted of a crime regarding your truthfulness, it can impact your ability to testify in a civil trial or obtain certain loans, among other things.
From The Website Of The FEDERAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION.
PUBLIC CORRUPTION:
"THE FBI's TOP CRIMINAL INVESTIGATIVE PRORITY
BECAUSE IT POSES A FUNDAMENTAL THREAT TO
OUR NATIONAL SECURITY AND WAY OF LIFE."
The F.B.I. Also Investigates Violations Of Federal Law
By Public Officials At The Federal, State, And
Local Level Of Government.
HOW DID ALL OF THIS COME ABOUT YOU ASK ??
(AND WELL YOU SHOULD !!)
What BEGAN with an INTENTIONAL, OVERT LIE, DECEPTION
& the AUTHORING of an OFFICIAL CITY DOCUMENT by
HAMBURG CITY CLERK/TREASURER JEREMY GRUENHAGEN
that HE KNEW CONTAINED FALSE and FABRICATED
INFORMATION; has now involved, in addition to the HAMBURG
MAYOR and the ENTIRE HAMBURG CITY COUNCIL; ’contract’ HAMBURG CITY ATTORNEY KELLEY C. DOHM of the Waconia law firm MELCHERT, HUBERT and SJODIN, as well as CARVER COUNTY ATTORNEY MARK METZ; ‘DEPUTY’ CARVER COUNTY ATTORNEY PETER IVY; the OFFICE OF LAWYER’S
PROFESSIONAL RESPONSIBILITY, the MANIPULATION of the CRIMINAL JUSTICE SYSTEM in order to ESCAPE PROSECUTION, MINNESOTA ATTORNEY GENERAL KEITH
ELLISON, the COMMISSIONER OF THE MINNESOTA SUPREME
COURT (an ‘appointee’ of Governor Walz) as well as
MINNESOTA GOVERNOR TIM WALZ,
himself !!
'CLICK' on the icon above to take the "HAMBURG SURVEY" and YOU'LL BE 'BLOWN AWAY' once you learn WHAT REALLY TOOK PLACE and the
IDENTITY OF THE PUBLIC OFFICIALS INVOLVED !!
You'll ALSO be TOTALLY AMAZED with how much you'll agree with me about the
'INAPPROPRIATENESS' of everything that's been taking place but
PUBLIC OFFICIALS
have 'kept under wraps'. Until now.
You'll probably even order a copy of my book
"PUBLIC OFFICIALS BEHAVING BADLY"
so you can find out EVEN MORE about what's taken place !! (And STILL IS !!)
Also, Here Are Two Pertinent & Applicable MINNESOTA STATUTES (State Laws)
That You Should Be Aware Of And Become Familiar With:
A public officer or employee who does any of the following, for which no other sentence is specifically provided by law, may be sentenced to imprisonment for not more than 364 days or to payment of a fine of not more than $3,000.00, or both:
(1) intentionally fails or refuses to perform a known mandatory, nondiscretionary, ministerial duty of the office or employment within the time or in the manner required by law; or
(2) in the capacity of such officer or employee, does an act knowing it is in excess of lawful authority or knowing it is forbidden by law to be done in that capacity; or
(3) under pretense or color of official authority intentionally and unlawfully injures another in the other's person, property, or rights; or
(4) in the capacity of such officer or employee, makes a return, certificate, official report, or other like document having knowledge it is false in any material respect.
From The Website Of The
FEDERAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION.
PUBLIC CORRUPTION:
"THE FBI's TOP CRIMINAL INVESTIGATIVE PRORITY BECAUSE IT POSES A FUNDAMENTAL THREAT
TO OUR NATIONAL SECURITY AND WAY OF LIFE."
The F.B.I. Also Investigates Violations Of Federal Law By Public Officials At The Federal, State, And LOCAL LEVEL
Of Government.
"FIDELITY, BRAVERY, INTEGRITY."
The Peaked Beveled Edge That Circumscribes The Seal Of The F.B.I. Symbolizes The Severe Challenges Confronting The
F.B.I And The Ruggedness Of The Organization.
MINNESOTA
STATUTE 351.14
DEFINITIONS
Subdivision 1. Applicability. The definitions in this section apply to sections 351.14 to 351.23.
Subd. 2. Malfeasance. "Malfeasance" means the willful commission of an unlawful or wrongful act in the performance of a public official's duties which is outside the scope of the authority of the public official and which infringes on the rights of any person or entity.
Subd. 3. Nonfeasance. "Nonfeasance" means the willful failure to perform a specific act which is a required part of the duties of the public official.
Subd. 4. Misfeasance. "Misfeasance" means the negligent performance of the duties of a public official or the negligent failure to perform a specific act which is a required part of the duties of the public official.
§Subd. 5. Elected county official. "Elected county official" means any public official who is elected to countywide office or appointed to an elective countywide office, including county attorney, county sheriff, county auditor, county recorder, county treasurer, and soil and water conservation supervisor.
"Elected county official"
also means a county commissioner elected or appointed from a commissioner district or a soil and water conservation district supervisor elected or appointed from a supervisor district established under section 103C.311, subdivision 2.
NOTE: Because of the 'discrepencies' noted below, I believe
that rather than this document being composed
BY
HAMBURG CITY CLERK/TREASURER JEREMEY GRUENHAGEN,
it was composed
FOR him !!
The PRIMARY ADVANTAGE Of Installing Light Emitting Diode (LED) Lighting Is The Small Amount Of Energy They Use As Compared To Flourescent, Quartz, Mercury Vapor,
Halogen And Sodium Vapor Lights.
However, To Realize That
Financial Savings;
THEY HAVE TO
BE TURNED OFF
DURING THE DAY !!
CORRUPTION:
"Dishonest or
illegal behavior
especially by powerful people;such as government
officials."
Because Of CITY CLERK/TREASURER JEREMY GRUENHAGEN'S REFUSAL To Provide ACCEPTABLE RESPONSES To My Inquiries, Please Check Back As I PUBLICLY ASK HAMBURG MAYOR CHRIS LUND VERY SPECIFIC
& DIRECT QUESTIONS SEEKING INFORMATION & DETAILS About
CRIMINAL ACIVITY In The CITY OF HAMBURG
'COVERED UP' By CITY OFFICIALS
Because Of WHO WAS INVOLVED !!
(Just Like The 'Fire Truck Tampering' That I Describe In My Book !!)
'Contract' Hamburg City Attorney Services Provided By Waconia Based
Law Firm
MELCHERT, HUBERT & SJODIN
WHO
Do You Think Is
INVOLVED ??
TO BETTER
UNDERSTAND WHAT
HAS TAKEN PLACE
THE 'IMAGE' OF HAMBURG IS NOT GOOD !!
Because Of The Negligence Of The
City A Person Fell & Was Injured.
The City's Insurance Company
DENIED THEIR INJURY CLAIM !!
East Side Of The City's
Electronic Sign
Taken @ 6:51AM
On 03-31-24
WHAT'S WRONG
WITH THIS PICTURE ??
The West Side Of The City's Electric Sign In BI-CENTENNIAL PARK Has Been 'DARK' For WEEKS !! The Portion Of The Sign Displaying
Our City's Name, Has Been
'DARK' For YEARS !!
PHOTO TAKEN
JULY 22, 2022 @ 1:40PM
(If This Isn't 'STEALING',
It's At Least 'CHEATING' !!)
Who's 'Keeping Track' ?
How Many Other Times
Has This Occurred ??
Who 'Reconciles' The
Employee Timecards ?
Where's The 'Accountability' ?
DATE: Thu, Apr 4, 7:42 AM
TO: City of Hamburg
SUBJECT: SECOND REQUEST - Inspection Of Documents
About SIX WEEKS AGO, the following is a portion of an email sent to you on February 23, 2024:
FIRST; beginning with the start of my four year City Council term on January 1, 2013 up to and including this date, February 23, 2024; please assemble, for my inspection; an accumulation/collection of ANY and ALL documents of ANY kind and in ANY format, whether written or electronic including, but not limited to; notes, letters, telephone calls, e-mails, text messages, (particularly communications of ANY KIND among or between Hamburg City Officials), as well as during City Council meetings, contained in City Council Meeting Agendas, contained in City Council Meeting 'Minutes'; in which ANY reference what-so ever, is made of, to or about me personally, and in which ANY reference what-so-ever is made of, to or about my recently published book,
"PUBLIC OFFICIALS BEHAVING BADLY" and in which ANY reference what-so-ever is made of, to or about my Websites, and/or ANY and ALL associated Webpages of those three Websites.
As of this writing, I have not been advised when I may 'inspect' the requested documents.
Richard Odoms
150 Jacob Street
Hamburg, Minnesota 55339
FROM: Jeremy Gruenhagen
DATE: Apr 4, 2024, 10:14 AM (3 days ago)
Mr. Odoms,
I want to inform you that the staff at City Hall is working hard to fulfill your request. Although your request is of a complex nature, we are making every effort to complete our review by the end of next week. Once we have gathered and reviewed all the necessary data with the help of the Attorney's Office, I will contact you to schedule a time for an inspection.
Thanks & Have a Great Day,
Jeremy Gruenhagen
City Clerk-Treasurer
P.O. Box 248
181 Broadway Avenue
Hamburg, MN 55339
952-467-3232
UPDATED, ALL NEW
"DELTA SHOW WEBSITE"
LOADED With FEATURES,
INFORMATION, 'LINKS' To
My OTHER WEBSITES &
MUCH, MUCH MORE !!
WHAT DOESN'T THE CITY UNDERSTAND ABOUT IT'S NOT
WISE TO WASTE TAXPAYER DOLLARS LEAVING 'ENERGY SAVING' LED SECURITY LIGHTING ON DURING THE DAY ??
CHECK OUT MY RECENTLY
LAUNCHED NEW WEBPAGE,
The Picture Below
Was Taken On
04-19-24 @ 3:38PM
SOME OTHER PERTANENT WEBPAGES ABOUT WHAT'S TAKING PLACE IN MINNE$OTA'$ WEALTHIE$T COUNTY
When I Sought To Be Elected Mayor of Hamburg In 2022, See What Some Of My 'Visions' Were For The City Of Hamburg
CORRUPTION:
"Dishonest or
illegal behavior
especially
by powerful
people; such
as government
officials."
COVER UP:
"A usually concerted effort
to keep an illegal
or unethical act
or situation
from being
made public."
Read My 'OPEN LETTER' To HAMBURG MAYOR CHRISTOPHER M. LUND Seeking EXPLANATIONS & ANSWERS About
The 'CORRUPTION' & 'GROSS 'MISCONDUCT' Of PUBLIC OFFICIALS I've UNCOVERED !! PLEASE CLICK HERE
"Elected officials are held
to a high standard."
MINNESOTA GOVERNOR TIM WALZ
04-26-24
Scroll Down To
READ Why
HAMBURG CITY OFFICIALS Should Be Thrown OUT Of Office And Thrown
IN Jail !!
"THE 'COVER UP', MORE THAN THE INITIAL WRONGDOING; IS WHAT IS MOST LIKELY TO BRING YOU DOWN."
Madelyn Albright, Former U.S. SECRETARY OF STATE
CORRUPTION
MISCONDUCT
'COVER UP'
I ASKED A SIMPLE QUESTION ABOUT
VANDALISM IN THE CITY AND HERE
ARE THE CITY'S
"Thank you for your email inquiry seeking answers to questions from the city as opposed to seeking the production of municipal data. The city is not in possession of any data that would contain answers to your below questions. The city is unable to provide answers to your questions. The city would refer you to the county for data that may contain answers to your questions. Thank you for your inquiry."
Jeremy Gruenhagen, Hamburg City Clerk-Treasurer
"The City does not have any data in its possession regarding your specific (above) questions and for that reason, the City will not be providing to you any responsive answers to your above questions."
Jeremy Gruenhagen, Hamburg City
Clerk-Treasurer
NO SURPRISE THERE !!
Is the City is trying to 'hide
something' ? AGAIN ?? Above is just ONE example of the B.S. that I have to deal with when I request PUBLIC information from the
CITY OF HAMBURG !!
This Is NOT The 'Official' Website Of The City Of Hamburg, But It SHOULD Be. !!
My Website
About The
City Of
CORRUPTION * MISCONDUCT * 'COVER UP'
PUBLIC OFFICIALS IN THIS CITY OF
ONLY 570 RESIDENTS, QUIETLY TUCKED AWAY IN THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF MINNE$OTA'$ WEALTHIE$T COUNTY; HAVE SERIOUS ISSUES
INVOLVING INTEGRITY, TRUTHFULNESS,
HONESTY & ACCOUNTABILITY.
Seeking ANSWERS & EXPLANATIONS !!
"THE 'COVER UP', MORE THAN THE INITIAL WRONGDOING;
IS WHAT IS MOST LIKELY TO BRING YOU DOWN."
MADELYN ALBRIGHT, (Former) UNITED STATES SECRETARY OF STATE
FORMER CITY COUNCILMEMBER &
RETIRED
DEPUTY SHERIFF
EXPOSES CORRUPTION,
MISCONDUCT & 'COVER UP'
IN CARVER COUNTY THAT
LOCAL MEDIA REFUSES TO
REPORT BECAUSE OF
WHO'S INVOLVED !!
FOR MORE
INFORMATION
ABOUT ME,